“A long time ago I posted a poll to see what people think about the issue of peer review. Now seems a good time to circulate it again. In previous posts (e.g. this one) I had advanced the view that, at least in the subject I work in (astrophysics), while in its usual form peer review does achieve some degree of quality control, it is by no means perfect. Some good papers get rejected and some poor papers get accepted …” (more)
[In the Dark, 14 February]