Powered by Besty WordPress Theme

Tags : peer review

Peer review: Can this critical step in the publication of science research be kinder?
A Peer Review Poll
Faux peer-reviewed journals: a threat to research integrity
If you can’t be kind in peer review, be neutral
The Economics of Trust in Peer Review
Trust as an Ethic and a Practice in Peer Review
Don’t be a prig in peer review
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals Don’t Really Do Their Job
To ensure the quality of peer reviewed research introduce randomness
21 Dos and Don’ts for Journal Writers and Reviewers
Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing
Not all academics are comfortable with the idea of open peer review
Don’t Even Think of Publishing in This Journal
Unhelpful, caustic and slow: the academic community should rethink the way publications are reviewed
Is peer review bad for your mental health?
Scientific peer review: an ineffective and unworthy institution
The peer review system has flaws. But it’s still a barrier to bad science
Amidst criticism of the peer review process, the valuable contributions of reviewers should be defended
Formal recognition for peer review will propel research forward
Gender bias distorts peer review across field
Next »