Tags : peer review

Prodding the behemoth with a stick

Peer review: Can this critical step in the publication of science research be kinder?

A Peer Review Poll

Faux peer-reviewed journals: a threat to research integrity

If you can’t be kind in peer review, be neutral

The Economics of Trust in Peer Review

Trust as an Ethic and a Practice in Peer Review

Don’t be a prig in peer review

Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals Don’t Really Do Their Job

To ensure the quality of peer reviewed research introduce randomness

21 Dos and Don’ts for Journal Writers and Reviewers

Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing

Not all academics are comfortable with the idea of open peer review

Don’t Even Think of Publishing in This Journal

Unhelpful, caustic and slow: the academic community should rethink the way publications are reviewed

Is peer review bad for your mental health?

Scientific peer review: an ineffective and unworthy institution

The peer review system has flaws. But it’s still a barrier to bad science

Amidst criticism of the peer review process, the valuable contributions of reviewers should be defended

Formal recognition for peer review will propel research forward

Next »