Are preprints a problem? 5 ways to improve the quality and credibility of preprints

Posted in Research on September 23rd, 2020 by steve

“Preprints are research reports have that have not yet been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. They have increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, high profile discredited studies have led to concerns that speed has been prioritized over the quality and credibility of evidence. Joeri Tijdink, Mario Malicki, Lex Bouter and Gowri Gopalakrishna argue that all stakeholders of the science system have a responsibility in improving the quality and credibility of pre-prints …” (more)

[LSE Impact Blog, 23 September]


Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing

Posted in Research on April 17th, 2019 by steve

International“Preprints – rapidly published non peer reviewed research articles – are becoming an increasingly common fixture in scholarly communication. However, without being peer reviewed they serve a limited function, as they are often not recognised as high quality research publications. In this post Wang LingFeng discusses how the development of preprint servers as self-organising peer review platforms could be the future of scholarly publication …” (more)

[LSE Impact Blog, 17 April]

Tags: ,

Biology’s Roiling Debate Over Publishing Research Early

Posted in Research on July 8th, 2017 by steve

International“Five years ago, Daniel MacArthur set out to build a massive library of human gene sequences – one of the biggest ever. The 60,706 raw sequences, collected from colleagues all over the globe, took up a petabyte of memory …” (more)

[Megan Molteni, Wired, 8 July]

Tags: , ,